The Japanese breast cancer society clinical practice guidelines for radiation treatment of breast cancer, 2022 edition.

The Breast Cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines, organized by the Japanese Breast Cancer Society (JBCS), were published in 2022. We present the English version of the Radiation Therapy (RT) section of the guidelines. The JBCS formed a task force to update the 2018 version of the JBCS Clinical Practice Guidelines. The Background Questions (BQs) contain the standard treatments for breast cancer in clinical practice, whereas the Clinical Questions (CQs) address daily clinical questions that remain controversial. Future Research Questions (FRQs) explore the subjects that are considered important issues, despite there being insufficient data for inclusion as CQs. The task force selected the 12 BQs, 8 CQs, and 6 FRQs for the RT section. For each CQ, systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses were conducted according to the Minds Manual for Guideline Development 2020, version 3.0. The recommendations, strength of recommendation, and strength of evidence for each CQ were determined based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and finalized by voting at the recommendation decision meeting.

Survival trends and patient characteristics between 2004 and 2016 for breast cancer in Japan based on the National Clinical Database-Breast Cancer Registry.

This is a prognostic report by the Japanese Breast Cancer Society on breast cancer extracted from the National Clinical Database-Breast Cancer Registry of Japan. Here, we present a summary of 457,878 breast cancer cases registered between 2004 and 2016. The median follow-up duration was 5.6 years. The median age at the start of treatment was 59 years (5-95%: 38-82 years) and increased from 57 years between 2004 and 2008 to 60 years between 2013 and 2016. The proportion of patients with Stage 0-II disease increased from 74.5% to 78.3%. The number of cases with estrogen and progesterone receptor positivity increased from 74.8% to 77.9% and 60.5% to 68.1%, respectively. Regarding (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy, the taxane (T) or taxane-cyclophosphamide (C) regimen increased by 2.4% to 8.2%, but the (fluorouracil (F)) adriamycin (A)-C-T/(F) epirubicin (E)C-T and (F)AC/(F)EC regimens decreased by 18.6% to 15.2% and 13.5% to 5.0%, respectively. Regarding (neo-)adjuvant anti-human epidermal growth factor-2 (HER2)-targeted therapy, the use of trastuzumab increased from 4.6% to 10.5%. The rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy increased from 37.1% to 60.7%, while that of axillary dissection decreased from 54.5% to 22.6%. Improvements in disease-free and overall survival were observed in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, but there was no apparent trend in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, or triple-negative breast cancers.

2020 Annual Report of National Clinical Database-Breast Cancer Registry: 10-year mortality of elderly breast cancer patients in Japan.

The Japanese Breast Cancer Society initiated the breast cancer registry in 1975, which transitioned to the National Clinical Database-Breast Cancer Registry in 2012. This annual report presents data from 2020 and analyzes the ten-year mortality rates for those aged 65 and older. We analyzed data from 93,784 breast cancer (BC) cases registered in 2020 and assessed 10-year mortality rates for 36,279 elderly patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2012. In 2020, 99.4% of BC cases were females with a median age of 61. Most (65%) were diagnosed at early stages (Stage 0 or I). Breast-conserving surgery rates varied with stages: 58.5% at cStage I, 30.8% at cStage II, and 13.1% at cStage III. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was done in 73.6% of cases, followed by radiotherapy in 70% of those post-conserving surgery and chemotherapy in 21.1% post-surgery. Pathology showed that 63.4% had tumors under 2.0 cm, 11.7% had pTis tumors, and 77.3% had no axillary lymph node metastasis. ER positivity was seen in 75.1%, HER2 in 14.3%, and 30% had a Ki67 positivity rate above 30%. Across all stages and subtypes, there was a trend where the 10-year mortality rates increased for individuals older than 65 years. In Stage I, many deaths were not directly linked to BC and, for those with HER2-type and triple-negative BC, breast cancer-related deaths increased with age. Within Stage II, patients older than 70 years with luminal-type BC often experienced deaths not directly linked to BC, whereas patients below 80 years with HER2-type and triple-negative BC, likely had breast cancer-related deaths. In Stage III, breast cancer-related deaths were more common, particularly in HER2 and triple-negative BC. Our prognostic analysis underscores distinct mortality patterns by stage, subtype, and age in elderly BC patients. It highlights the importance of personalized treatment strategies, considering subtype-specific aggressiveness, age-related factors, and comorbidities.

Annual report of the Japanese Breast Cancer Registry for 2019.

This is an annual report by the Japanese Breast Cancer Society regarding the clinical data on breast cancer extracted from the National Clinical Database-Breast Cancer Registry (NCD-BCR) of Japan. Here, we present an updated summary of 98,300 breast cancer cases registered in 2019. The median age at cancer diagnosis was 61 years (interquartile range 49-72 years), and 30.6% of the breast cancer patients were premenopausal. Of the 93,840 patients without distant metastases, 14,118 (15.0%) and 42,047 (44.8%) were diagnosed with stage 0 and I disease, respectively. Breast-conserving surgery was performed in 42,080 (44.8%) patients. Regarding axillary procedures, 62,677 (66.8%) and 7371 (7.9%) patients underwent sentinel node biopsy and axillary node dissection after biopsy, respectively. Whole breast irradiation was administered to 29,795 (70.8%) of the 42,080 patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Chest wall irradiation was administered to 5524 (11.1%) of the 49,637 patients who underwent mastectomy. Of the 6912 clinically lymph node-negative patients who received preoperative therapy, 5250 (76.0%) and 427 (6.2%) underwent sentinel node biopsy and axillary node dissection after biopsy, respectively; however, 602 (8.7%) patients initially underwent axillary node dissection without biopsy.

Symptom palliation with QUAD Shot radiation therapy to penile metastasis derived from descending colon cancer: a case report.

A 54-year-old man was diagnosed with descending colon cancer with metastases in the liver, para-aortic lymph nodes, and penis, and chemotherapy was introduced after construction of a colostomy. The patient reported only mild penile pain at the time of diagnosis; however, the pain gradually worsened and interfered with his daily life. Opioids did not provide sufficient analgesia, and the patient developed dysuria and priapism. Through construction of a cystostomy, palliative radiotherapy with QUAD Shot regimen (14 Gy in 4 fractions twice-daily on 2 days repeated every 4 weeks) to the penile metastasis was started for pain relief and tumor shrinkage. The radiation rapidly improved the penile symptoms, enabling opioid reduction and cystostomy removal. The patient remained pain-free and able to urinate on his own until his death. Metastatic penile tumors are rare, especially those derived from colon cancer. Penile metastases occur mainly in the late stages of cancer and may impair the patient's quality of life. In such cases, palliative radiotherapy, especially with QUAD Shot regimen, is useful with short treatment time, durable symptom control, and little adverse effect, maintaining quality of life.

Local control correlates with overall survival in radiotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: Local control (LC) is an important outcome of local cancer therapy, besides overall survival (OS). We conducted a comprehensive literature search to investigate whether a high LC rate contributes to good OS in radiotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies in patients receiving radiotherapy for peripheral ES-NSCLC, mainly staged as T1-2N0M0 were included for a systematic review. Relevant information was collected including, dose fractionation, T stage, median age, 3-year LC, cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and OS. Correlations between outcomes and clinical variables were evaluated. RESULTS: After screening, 101 data points from 87 studies including 13,435 patients were selected for the quantitative synthesis. Univariate meta-regression analysis revealed that the coefficients between the 3-year LC and 3-year DFS, DMFS, CSS, and OS were 0.753 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.307-1.199; p < 0.001), 0.360 (95% CI: 0.128-0.593; p = 0.002), 0.766 (95% CI: 0.489-1.044; p < 0.001), and 0.574 (95% CI: 0.275-0.822; p < 0.001), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the 3-year LC (coefficient, 0.561; 95% CI: 0.254-0.830; p < 0.001) and T1 proportion (coefficient, 0.207; 95% CI: 0.030-0.385; p = 0.012) were significantly associated with the 3-year OS and CSS (coefficient for 3-year LC, 0.720; 95% CI: 0.468-0.972; p < 0.001 and T1 proportion, 0.002; 95% CI: 0.000-0.003; p = 0.012). Toxicities ≥ grade 3 were low (3.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Three-year LC was correlated with three-year OS in patients receiving radiotherapy for ES-NSCLC. A 5% increase in 3-year LC is expected to improve the 3-year CSS and OS rates by 3.8% and 2.8%, respectively.

Dynamic conformal arc radiotherapy for locally advanced lung cancer: a comparison with static-beam conformal radiotherapy.

Background: This study investigated whether the dose distribution of lung cancer can be improved by dynamic arc conformal radiotherapy (dynamic CRT) compared with static multiple-beam radiotherapy (static CRT). Materials and methods: A dummy study of static CRT and dynamic CRT was performed, designed to meet the predetermined dose constraints. A dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions was administered using two dose prescription methods: dose prescribed to the isocenter (IC prescription), and dose prescribed to > 50% of the planning target volume (D50 prescription). Dose-volume parameters were compared between the plans. Results: Among 20 patients with locally advanced lung cancer, dose conformity was significantly better with dynamic CRT than static CRT (median conformity index: 1.3 vs. 2.2; p < 0.01). As for the lung dose, compared with static CRT, dynamic CRT did not increase the percentage lung volume receiving ≥ 20 Gy (18.9% vs. 19.3%, p = 0.09). The maximum spinal cord dose was significantly reduced by dynamic CRT (static vs. dynamic CRT: 44.1 vs. 25.2 Gy, p < 0.001). With the change from IC to D50 prescription, the 95% isodose volume increased by 18.3 cc in static CRT and by 4.1 cc in dynamic CRT, while doses to the lung and spinal cord remained within the acceptable ranges. Conclusion: The dynamic CRT technique showed better target coverage and lower doses to the spinal cord in exchange for increased low-dose lung area, compared with static CRT. Dynamic CRT with D50 prescription instead of prescription to the isocenter has excellent dose distribution profiles without compromising doses to organs at risk for lung cancer at favorable locations.

Relationship between Dose Prescription Methods and Local Control Rate in Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Early Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Variations in dose prescription methods in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC) make it difficult to properly compare the outcomes of published studies. We conducted a comprehensive search of the published literature to summarize the outcomes by discerning the relationship between local control (LC) and dose prescription sites. We systematically searched PubMed to identify observational studies reporting LC after SBRT for peripheral ES-NSCLC. The correlations between LC and four types of biologically effective doses (BED) were evaluated, which were calculated from nominal, central, and peripheral prescription points and, from those, the average BED. To evaluate information on SBRT for peripheral ES-NSCLC, 188 studies were analyzed. The number of relevant articles increased over time. The use of an inhomogeneity correction was mentioned in less than half of the articles, even among the most recent. To evaluate the relationship between the four BEDs and LC, 33 studies were analyzed. Univariate meta-regression revealed that only the central BED significantly correlated with the 3-year LC of SBRT for ES-NSCLC (p = 0.03). As a limitation, tumor volume, which might affect the results of this study, could not be considered due to a lack of data. In conclusion, the central dose prescription is appropriate for evaluating the correlation between the dose and LC of SBRT for ES-NSCLC. The standardization of SBRT dose prescriptions is desirable.

Role of stereotactic body radiotherapy in multidisciplinary management of liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer.

In the treatment of colorectal cancer patients with distant metastases, the development of new anticancer agents has considerably prolonged progression-free survival. Such survival benefits attributed to chemotherapy have increased the relative significance of local therapy in patients with limited metastases. The liver is recognized as the most common site of metastasis of colorectal cancer because of the intestinal mesenteric drainage to the portal veins. Hepatic resection of isolated liver metastases of colorectal cancer is the only option for a potential cure. However, hepatic metastases are resectable in only approximately 20% of the patients. For remaining patients with high-risk resectable liver metastases or those who are unfit for surgery, less invasive, local therapies including radiation therapy (stereotactic body radiation therapy, SBRT) may have a potential role in treatment. Although the local control rate of SBRT for colorectal liver metastases has room for improvement, its less-invasive nature and broad indications deserve consideration. Future research should include SBRT dose escalation or the selection of patients who benefit from local ablative therapies. SBRT may offer an alternative, non-invasive approach for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases in a multidisciplinary treatment strategy.

Applying Artificial Neural Networks to Develop a Decision Support Tool for Tis-4N0M0 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Clear evidence indicating whether surgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is best for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is lacking. SBRT has many advantages. We used artificial neural networks (NNs) to predict treatment outcomes for patients with NSCLC receiving SBRT, aiming to aid in decision making. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among consecutive patients receiving SBRT between 2005 and 2019 in our institution, we retrospectively identified those with Tis-T4N0M0 NSCLC. We constructed two NNs for prediction of overall survival (OS) and cancer progression in the first 5 years after SBRT, which were tested using an internal and an external test data set. We performed risk group stratification, wherein 5-year OS and cancer progression were stratified into three groups. RESULTS: In total, 692 patients in our institution and 100 patients randomly chosen in the external institution were enrolled. The NNs resulted in concordance indexes for OS of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.79), 0.68 (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.75), and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.61 to 0.76) and area under the curve for cancer progression of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.84), 0.72 (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.83), and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.81) in the training, internal test, and external test data sets, respectively. The survival and cumulative incidence curves were significantly stratified. NNs selected low-risk cancer progression groups of 5.6%, 6.9%, and 7.0% in the training, internal test, and external test data sets, respectively, suggesting that 48% of patients with peripheral Tis-4N0M0 NSCLC can be at low-risk for cancer progression. CONCLUSION: Predictions of SBRT outcomes using NNs were useful for Tis-4N0M0 NSCLC. Our results are anticipated to open new avenues for NN predictions and provide decision-making guidance for patients and physicians.

Radiation Therapy for Malignant Lumbosacral Plexopathy: A Case Series.

Background Malignant lumbosacral plexopathy is caused by a direct extension of an intrapelvic malignancy to involve the plexus nerves. In this report, we describe the effect of radiotherapy on patients with malignant lumbosacral plexopathy. Patients and methods We performed a retrospective review of the medical records of patients who underwent radiation therapy for pain caused by malignant lumbosacral plexopathy between 2017 and 2020 at our institution. The pain was measured using a numeric rating scale (0-10) at initiation and completion of radiotherapy or at the time when the maximum response was observed. Results A total of 12 tumor sites in 11 patients were included. Eight of the tumors invaded the iliopsoas muscle, and the remaining four invaded or abutted the piriformis muscle. The mean duration of follow-up was 215 days (31-675 days). All patients achieved pain relief at the end of radiotherapy, with complete resolution of pain in nine patients. The maximum effect was seen at a mean of three weeks (1-12 weeks) after the initiation of radiotherapy. Toxicities related to radiotherapy included grade 1 diarrhea in four patients and grade 1 frequent urination in one patient. Two patients experienced a relapse of pain at one and two months, respectively, after achieving their maximal response. Conclusion Radiotherapy provides significant pain relief for patients with the malignant lumbosacral syndrome. The recognition and diagnosis of this syndrome, and the use of radiation therapy as a therapeutic option, are important. Patients should be offered all possible therapies, regardless of curative or palliative intent.

Three Cases of Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Massive Macrovascular Invasion Successfully Treated With Radiotherapy.

In clinical practice, the treatment approach for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with macrovascular invasion (MVI) is determined on a case-by-case basis. The common management options include systemic and local therapies, although the former is the more widely accepted approach. We present three cases of HCC with MVI successfully treated with radiotherapy. The first patient was a 62-year-old man with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis who had a 5.7-cm treatment-naïve HCC invading the bilateral branches of the portal vein. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) was administered, with no evidence of recurrence observed at the 24-month follow-up. The second patient was an 81-year-old man with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis who had a 3.8-cm HCC invading the inferior vena cava (IVC). Transcatheter chemoembolization performed one month earlier had been ineffective, and the tumor had grown rapidly. SBRT was administered, and no evidence of recurrence was observed up to his death from pneumonia 24 months after the treatment initiation. The third patient was a 72-year-old man with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis who had a 6.7-cm treatment-naïve HCC with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) from the main trunk to the secondary branches of both lobes. PVTT was treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy, while the primary HCC and intrahepatic recurrent lesions were subsequently treated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and five rounds of ablation. Six months after the last ablation (48 months after initial therapy), no evidence of recurrence was observed. Our cases illustrate that radiotherapy leads to the successful treatment of HCC with MVI.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With a High Maximum Dose Improves Local Control, Cancer-Specific Death, and Overall Survival in Peripheral Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: We investigated whether delivery of a high biologically effective dose (BED) to primary tumors affects systemic outcomes of cancer-specific death (CSD) and overall survival (OS) rates after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Among consecutive ES-NSCLC patients treated with SBRT between 2005 and 2019, we retrospectively identified patients who received a prescription of 50 to 60 Gy in 5 fractions with maximum doses of 62.5 to 100 Gy. Patients were categorized by maximum BED within the planning target volume with a threshold dose of 200 Gy. Outcomes were analyzed in all and matched patients. RESULTS: Overall, 433 patients were eligible, and 262 and 171 patients were categorized into HighBED and LowBED groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, pairs of 154 patients were selected. Median follow-up times for the HighBED and LowBED groups were 52.3 months (range, 0.8-107.2 months) and 121.6 months (range, 3.0-162.8 months), respectively. The local recurrence rate in the HighBED group was significantly lower than that in the LowBED group (5-year rate, 1.3% and 7.2%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.65; P = .011). Rates of any recurrence and CSD in the HighBED group were significantly lower (5-year any recurrence: 18.1% and 32.1%; HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.83; P = .0058; 5-year CSD: 9.5% and 21.8%; HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20-0.70; P = .002), and OS in the HighBED group was significantly better compared with the LowBED group (5-year rate: 61.7% and 51.8%; HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.50-1.00; P = .047). CONCLUSION: In patients with peripheral ES-NSCLC, SBRT with a high maximum dose may improve not only local control, but also any recurrence, CSD, and OS rates without increased toxicity. Further trials designed to evaluate whether higher intensity SBRT increases local control rates and contributes to improved CSD and OS outcomes are anticipated.

Comparison of stereotactic body radiotherapy and radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score studies.

AIM: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and has shown excellent local control (LC), as has radiofrequency ablation (RFA). As no randomized controlled trial has compared SBRT and RFA for HCC, data from a propensity score matched study (PSMS) are valuable. However, the results varied greatly and depended on composing factors of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging (BCLC-factors) adjusted. Therefore, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analyses of the studies focusing on BCLC-factors matching. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, the Cochrane database, EMBASE, and Web of Science to identify studies comparing RFA and SBRT using propensity scores. The hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS) and LC from BCLC-factor-matched and -unmatched PSMS were pooled. Heterogeneity between the data from these studies was assessed. RESULTS: Three BCLC-factor-matched studies were identified. Stereotactic body radiotherapy led to comparable OS (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.74-1.08; p = 0.24; I2  = 0%; p for heterogeneity, 0.56) and significantly better LC (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.30-0.51; p < 0.001; I2  = 0%; p for heterogeneity, 0.67). We also identified three additional BCLC-factor-unmatched studies (HR of OS, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.21-1.65; p < 0.0001; I2  = 0%; p for heterogeneity, 0.63). However, considerable heterogeneity was observed for HR of OS between BCLC-factor-matched and -unmatched studies (I2  = 92.6%; p for heterogeneity, 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: When BCLC-factors were properly adjusted, the results of the meta-analysis revealed equivalent OS and better LC for SBRT compared with RFA. Stereotactic body radiotherapy could be an alternative treatment option for HCC.

Multicenter prospective study of stereotactic body radiotherapy for previously untreated solitary primary hepatocellular carcinoma: The STRSPH study.

AIM: To prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with previously untreated solitary primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: The main eligibility criteria included the following: (1) primary solitary HCC; (2) no prior treatment for HCC; (3) Child-Turcotte-Pugh score of seven or less; and (4) unsuitability for or refusal of surgery and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The prescribed dose of SBRT was 40 Gy in five fractions. The primary endpoint was 3-year overall survival (OS); the secondary endpoints included local progression-free survival (LPFS), local control (LC), and adverse events. The accrual target was 60 patients, expecting a 3-year OS of 70% with a 50% threshold. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2018, 36 patients were enrolled; enrollment was closed early because of slow accrual. The median tumor size was 2.3 cm. The median follow-up at the time of evaluation was 20.8 months. The 3-year OS was 78% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 53%-90%). The 3-year LPFS and LC proportion were 73% (95% CI: 48%-87%) and 90% (95% CI: 65%-97%), respectively. Grade 3 or higher SBRT-related toxicities were observed in four patients (11%), and grade five toxicities were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed acceptably low incidence of SBRT-related toxicities. LC and OS after SBRT were comparable for previously untreated solitary HCC for patients unfit for resection and RFA. Although a definitive conclusion cannot be drawn by this study, the promising results indicate that SBRT may be an alternative option in the management of early HCC.

The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guideline for radiation treatment of breast cancer, 2018 edition.

PURPOSE: The Japanese Breast Cancer Society (JBCS) Clinical Practice Guideline was revised in 2018. This article describes the revise points in the section on radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The JBCS formed task force to update the JBCS Clinical Practice Guideline 2015 edition. Background questions (BQs) deal with standard treatments of breast cancer in clinical practice. Clinical questions (CQs) highlight the important treatments in which controversy remains. The task force for RT section addressed the 10 BQs, the 10 CQs, and the 4 Future reseach questions (FQs). For each CQ, systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses were conducted, and recommendations, strength of recommendation and strength of evidence were determined according to the protocol in Morizane et al. (Minds Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development, 2014). RESULTS: The recommendations, the strength of recommendation and the strength of evidence were determined based on the systematic literature reviews and the meta-analyses for each CQ. CONCLUSION: The JBCS updated the Clinical Practice Guideline. RT represents a significant portion of the breast cancer treatment, and these recommendations regarding RT will be useful in individualized, shared decision making between physicians and patients.

Questionnaire survey comparing surgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer: lessons from patients with experience of both modalities.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is some controversy regarding indications for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung cancer patients. We investigated the treatment preferences of patients with experience of both surgery and SBRT using a questionnaire survey. METHODS: Of lung cancer patients treated with SBRT between 2005 and 2017, we identified those who also previously underwent surgery for lung cancer. These patients were asked about their experiences of surgery and SBRT including perceived condition, distress, stress, convenience, adverse effects, and satisfaction during and after treatment. Participants were also asked about treatment decision-making for hypothetical scenarios. RESULTS: Of 653 lung cancer patients treated with SBRT, 149 also underwent surgery for lung cancer, 52 of whom participated in this questionnaire. The median age at the time of this survey was 76 years (range, 59-91 years). Significantly more participants had a favorable impression of SBRT during and after treatment (all question items; P<0.01). In terms of overall satisfaction, 27 patients preferred SBRT and three patients preferred surgery. In a hypothetical scenario (equivalent treatment outcomes) aged 70 years and faced with decision-making for first-time lung cancer treatment, significantly more patients selected SBRT (P<0.01): 38 patients selected SBRT. In a scenario with 20% better survivals for surgical resection, 14 patients selected SBRT, 12 selected surgery, and 26 were indecisive (P=0.47). In a scenario at age 80 years, significantly more patients selected SBRT (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with experience of both surgery and SBRT for lung cancer prefer SBRT. This information would be helpful at treatment decision-making.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary non-small cell lung cancer patients with clinical T3-4N0M0 (UICC 8th edition): outcomes and patterns of failure.

The evidence for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is meagre for patients with clinical T3-4N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer (8th Edition of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC)). This study retrospectively investigated clinical outcomes following SBRT for such patients. Among consecutive patients treated with SBRT, patients staged as cT3-4N0M0 by all criteria were examined, most of whom were unsuitable to chemoradiotherapy due to their fragile characters. Clinical outcomes were evaluated and factors associated with outcomes were investigated. Between 2005 and 2017, 70 eligible patients (T3: 58, T4: 12; median age 81 (63-93) years) were identified. Median follow-up duration was 28.6 (1.0-142.5) months. No adjuvant chemotherapy was administered. The 3-year local recurrence rates were 15.8% and 16.7% in T3 and T4 patients, respectively, and they were significantly lower in the high-dose group (3.1% vs 28.6%, P < 0.01). Multivariate analyses showed that the dose-volumetric factor was the significant factor for local recurrence. The 3-year regional and distant metastasis rates, cancer-specific mortality, and overall survival in T3 and T4 patients were 22.7% and 25.0%, 26.5% and 33.3%, 32.2% and 41.7%, and 39.5% and 41.7%, respectively. Only age was correlated with overall survival. Radiation pneumonitis ≥grade 3 and fatal hemoptysis occurred in 3 and 1 patients, respectively. SBRT for cT3-4N0M0 lung cancer patients achieved good local control. Survival was rather good considering that patients were usually frail, staged with clinical staging, and were not given adjuvant chemotherapy, and it may be comparable to surgery. To validate these outcomes following SBRT, a prospective study is warranted.